Grow Up. Step Up. Shut Up. Or Show Up

 

Grow Up. Step Up. Shut Up. Or Show Up.

Got No Fucks Left to Give

I. Chuck Schumer Was Right

Sometimes, leadership doesn’t look like fireworks — it looks like foresight.

In a storm of blurred faces and muted mouths, one lone figure jabs a finger skyward like they’ve had it with everyone’s bullshit — especially the powerful, the passive, and the performative. It’s not just defiance. It’s a visual “read the room.”
Chuck Schumer took heat from all sides — the press, the left, the Very Online — for not forcing a government shutdown during the Continuing Resolution Budget Bill. I don't deny he could have handled his interaction with the House better They said he blinked. That he let the moment slip. That he didn’t fight hard enough.

But Schumer wasn’t playing Twitter chess. He saw the trap for what it was:

Shut down the government, and Trump gets to decide what stays open.
Trump gets to decide when it reopens.
And Trump gets to prove his favorite point — that government doesn’t work.

What looked like a retreat was actually a sidestep. Schumer didn’t hand Trump the chance to weaponize a shutdown. He refused to help the arsonist claim victimhood.

And you’ll note:
Nancy Pelosi didn’t say he was wrong — she just said she would’ve “gotten something for it.”
That’s not contradiction. That’s two seasoned leaders reading the same playbook from different pages.

Schumer chose strategy over spectacle. And in hindsight? That looks a lot smarter than the loud ones.

II. The Democrats Love Kabuki Theater

Let’s talk about El Salvador. First, the older and wiser Senator Chris Van Hollen went — and he got results. He went to advocate for his detained constituent and made meaningful progress. That’s what strategy looks like.

Then, just the other day, four younger Democrats traveled to El Salvador. Not to negotiate. Not to rescue. What made headlines was an interview staged outside the gates of CICOT — a detention center.

Maybe they didn’t fly down just for the photo op. But that kind of proves the point, doesn’t it? They likely thought that just being there, just showing up with cameras rolling, would 'automagically'
mean something. That optics alone would deliver change.

That’s not strategy. That’s content.
A high-production-value moment that wins likes, not policy shifts.

The generational divide means some will see it as “fighting the good fight.”
But fight for what? What did they win?

The sad truth is, outcome no longer seems required — only performance.

Shutting down the government during Trump’s term would’ve been another performance.
An expensive one. One that Trump could’ve twisted into firepower.
And Schumer didn’t take the bait.

Because here’s the thing: Trump doesn’t think like the rest of the world. He doesn’t play by institutional logic or political restraint. If the government had shut down, he might have left it closed — for weeks, maybe even until the midterms. Unlikely? Sure. But not impossible. Spite and malice are not side effects of his politics — they are the engine. And he’s gone to extremes before, just to watch the country squirm.

III. The Vice Chair Problem: Passion Without Patience

Let’s not pretend this is just a problem of loud freshman House reps and attention-starved senators. The rot goes all the way up.

Take the DNC Vice Chair, who recently announced plans to use PAC funds to primary sitting Democrats in safe districts — because they’re 'asleep at the wheel.' That kind of rhetoric? It's not bold. It’s borrowed. It’s the same narrative Trump and his allies use to delegitimize anyone who doesn’t burn the house down fast enough. And I guarantee you — he would’ve praised the El Salvador theatrics like it was the moral climax of a Netflix special.

When asked if the DNC Chair agreed with this approach, the answer wasn’t 'yes.' And that’s what worries me most: we are living in a moment — not just in a party, but in a generation — that can no longer even recognize wisdom. And if you can’t recognize it, how in the hell are you ever supposed to inherit it?

What’s worse is that some of these Gen Z rising stars have started to mirror the very thing they claim to hate — Donald Trump. Trump reads memes and calls it intelligence. He makes decisions based on ego and vibes, not knowledge. And too many of his critics on the left are now mimicking that same behavior: sourcing 'wisdom' from Instagram slideshows and tweet threads, confusing assertiveness with insight. They’re not just uninformed — they don’t even realize how much they don’t know.

IV. Boomer Blame and Generational Bullshit

When COVID first hit, a smug wave of “Boomer Doomer” commentary surfaced — like it was clever to root for a pandemic to take out a generation.
Newsflash: the same generation that gave you Earth Day, the gay rights movement, and every damn protest playlist you romanticize.

You look at the world and think we broke it.
Bitch, what are you doing to save it?

Because here’s the other truth:
You rail against capitalism from your $1,300 phone.
You want climate justice, but you’ll line up around the block for a new Apple product without once thinking about the lithium mines, the rare earth materials, the labor exploitation, the carbon footprint.

You mourn environmental collapse between crypto transactions.
You dunk on Boomer politics from a server farm that could power a small nation.

Hypocrisy isn’t a vibe. It’s a disqualifier.
And you can't perform your way out of it.

One of the loudest leftist talking points is:

“I’m the first generation that won’t do better than my parents.”

You know what that sounds like?
White. Entitled. And willfully blind to the fact that millions of families of color never even had the foothold you’re lamenting.

The left has its grievances.
But it also has its blind spots.
And age bias is one of them.

V. Grow Up. Step Up. Shut Up. Or Show Up.

We’re done mistaking volume for victory.
We’re done cheering theatrics while losing ground.

And let’s be real: this is an ageism post. So here’s some generational truth you might not like —

A couple generations now have spent way too much time in front of the wrong screens.

Too many confuse exposure with understanding. They’ve read Reddit threads about geopolitics and think that makes them fluent in diplomacy. They’ve played a thousand hours of simulation games and mistake that for economic expertise. And some — bless their hearts — learn about relationships and gender dynamics from forums and echo chambers that do nothing but recycle bitterness.

None of that is the real world. It’s a curated simulation, and too many are mistaking it for lived experience.

You’re young. You’re Black. You’ve got friends from around the world in your Discord and your TikTok comments.
You’ve convinced yourself color doesn’t matter anymore.

Surprise: it still does.
Because the real world isn’t behind that screen.
And while it should be better by now — it’s not. At least not yet.

And when the revolution comes?

It won’t be livestreamed. It won’t be digitized.
It won’t be a trending sound or a stitched reaction or a Canva graphic.
You’ll have to be out there in it.

You’re getting your first real taste of what happens when the world goes sideways despite your best efforts. Welcome to the party.

Now grow up, grab a shovel, and help dig us out — or get out of the way.

This isn’t about aesthetics. This is about action.
Pick a side. Plant a flag. And do the damn work — for real this time.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Long Torrid Love Affair

Image
If one accepts the importance of storytellers in a culture—their role in shaping the dynamics of society, molding behavior, and influencing how we interact with one another—then we’re in trouble. A couple of weeks ago, I caught RED on TV. It was a double feature showing alongside RED 2 . Have you seen them? They’re entertaining, the kind of movies that make you laugh but don’t stick with you. RED stands for "Retired, Extremely Dangerous." Bruce Willis, Morgan Freeman, and John Malkovich play retired CIA agents caught up in the fallout from a past mission. They’re aided by Helen Mirren, a retired MI6 operative. I honestly can’t even recall the mission that dragged them back into action. It should matter, but it doesn’t. What sticks out instead is how much these characters bemoan the passing of days when they don’t get to kill someone. It’s a comedy, so I laughed along. I was entertained. And later, I reflected… this was essentially a convening of serial killers. From RED 2 ,...
Read more

How Performative Outrage Keeps Us Distracted and Divided

Image
Breaking Free from the Outrage Cycle: A Call to Pursue Truth I’m frustrated with the state of the world. It feels like nothing in my background prepared me for this—if anything, I was raised to expect something completely different. Like a lot of people, I’m struggling to make sense of how society became so divided, reactive, and exhausting. What I’ve learned is that outrage on its own is a dead end. You can do one of three things with it: take action, learn to accept and live with what’s upsetting you, or just keep it to yourself. But social media doesn’t work like that. It feeds on outrage, encouraging us to post the same grievances over and over, pretending we’re shocked every time. Trump lied? No kidding, that’s his thing. The GOP did something hypocritical? That’s their entire brand. And yet, we’re trapped in this cycle of performative indignation, as if every example of bad behavior is a brand-new revelation. The Outrage Machine Social media makes outrage profitable. Every time y...
Read more

Man vs. Money

Image
  Man vs. Money A nation built on two ideals — one of them a parasite.   This country was never just founded on freedom. It was built on two conflicting ideologies — the rights of man , and the pursuit of money. And from the beginning, those two forces have been fighting it out. In choosing to enshrine both ideologies — the rights of man and the pursuit of wealth — in the same foundational documents, the Founding Fathers opened the door to the beast. They wove contradiction into the country’s very DNA. One ideal sought liberty and equality; the other sought profit, even if it meant exploitation. And the tension between those two has shaped every chapter since. We have pretended for more than two hundred years that these competing ideologies could rest easy in each other’s company. But I fear Money has always been waiting for Man to relax — to slip into sleep — so it could garrote him in the dark. Where "man" meant dignity, community, shared burden, and collective good — ...
Read more